Page:A history of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages, volume 2.djvu/95

 FOULQUES DE SAINT-GEORGES. 79 uous in the affair of Castel Fabri, and was evidently regarded as a desirable ally in the impending struggle. According to his own story he advised Pequigny to let the Inquisition alone, as experi- ence had shown that effort was useless ; but on being called again to Toulouse on some business connected with the Priory of la Daurade, and having to visit Paris in connection with the will of Louis, Bishop of Toulouse, it was arranged, at Pequigny' s sugges- tion, that he should accompany a deputation which the citizens of Albi were sending to the king to invoke his active intervention. The court was at Senlis, whither they repaired, and there came also Pequigny to justify himself, and Frere Foulques with several Dominicans, eager to estabhsh the innocence of the Inquisition.* The battle was fought out before the king. Bernard urged the suspension of the inquisitors during an investigation, or that the Dominicans should be permanently declared ineligible while awaiting final action by the Holy See. Supported by Frere Guil- laume, the king's Dominican confessor, Foulques preferred charges against Pequigny, but could furnish no proofs. Pequigny retort- ed with accusations against Foulques, and a commission, consist- ing of the Archbishop of Narbonne and the Constable of France, was appointed to hear both sides. After due deliberation, it re- ported in favor of Pequigny, and the king took the unheard-of step of removing the inquisitor. He at first requested this of the Dominican Provincial of Paris, who possessed the power to do so, but that official called together a chapter, which contented itself with appointing an adjunct, and ordering Foulques to retain office tiU the middle of the following Lent, in order to complete the tri- als which he had already commenced. This gave Philippe great offence, which he expressed in the most outspoken terms in letters to his chaplain and to the Bishop of Toulouse, whom he bitterly reproached for advising acceptance of the terms. He did not content himself with words, for simultaneously, December 8, 1301, he wrote to the bishop, the Inquisitor of Toulouse, and the seneschals of Toulouse and Albi, stating that the imploring cries of his subjects, including prelates and ecclesiastics, counts, bar- ons, and other distinguished men, convinced him that Foulques was guilty of the charges preferred against him, including crimes
 * MSS. Bib. Nat., fonds latin, No. 4270, fol. 16, 149.