Page:A Greek English Lexicon of the New Testament.djvu/52

ἀλλά ix. 22; xvi. 7; Lk. vii. 7; Jn. viii. 26; xvi. 4; Acts ix. 6 [not Rec.]; x. 20; xxvi. 16. &emsp; 7. it is put elliptically: 🇬🇷, i. e. 🇬🇷, Mk. xiv. 49; Jn. xiii. 18; xv. 25; 1 Jn. ii. 19. &emsp; 8. after a conditional or concessive protasis it signifies, at the beginning of the apodosis, yet [cf. W. 442 (411)]: after 🇬🇷, 2 Co. xiii. 4 [R G]; Mk. xiv. 29 R G L, (2 Macc. viii. 15); after 🇬🇷, Mk. xiv. 29 [T Tr WH]; 2 Co. iv. 16; v. 16; xi. 6; Col. ii. 5, (2 Macc. vi. 26); after 🇬🇷, 1 Co. ix. 2; Ro. vi. 5, (1 Macc. ii. 20); after 🇬🇷, 1 Co. iv. 15; after 🇬🇷, 1 Co. viii. 6 [L Tr mrg. WH br. 🇬🇷]; cf. Klotz ad Devar. ii. p. 93 sq.; Kühner ii. p. 827, § 535 Anm. 6. &emsp; 9. after a preceding 🇬🇷: Mk. ix. 13 [T om. Tr br. 🇬🇷]; Acts iv. 16; Ro. xiv. 20; 1 Co. xiv. 17. &emsp; 10. it is joined to other particles; 🇬🇷 [Grsb. 🇬🇷] (twice in the N. T.): yet at least, 1 Co. ix. 2; yet surely (aber freilich), Lk. xxiv. 21 [L T Tr WH add 🇬🇷 yea and etc.], cf. Bornemann ad loc. In the more elegant Greek writers these particles are not combined without the interposition of the most emphatic word between them; cf. Bornemann l. c.; Klotz ad Devar. ii. pp. 15 sq. 24 sq.; Ast, Lex. Plat. i. p. 101; [W. 444 (413)]. 🇬🇷 (arising from the blending of the two statements 🇬🇷 and 🇬🇷) save only, except: 1 Co. iii. 5 (where 🇬🇷 omitted by G L T Tr WH is spurious); Lk. xii. 51, (Sir. xxxvii. 12: xliv. 10); and after 🇬🇷 itself, 2 Co. i. 13 [here Lchm. br. 🇬🇷 before 🇬🇷]; cf. Klotz u. s. ii. 31 sqq.; Kühner ii. p. 824 sq. § 535, 6; W. 442 (412); [B. 374 (320)]. 🇬🇷 but not, yet not: Heb. iii. 16 (if punctuated 🇬🇷; 🇬🇷) for ‘but why do I ask? did not all?’ etc.; cf. Bleek ad loc. [W. 442 (411)]. 🇬🇷 will he not rather? Lk. xvii. 8. &emsp; II. preceded by a negation: but (Lat. sed, Germ. sondern); &emsp; 1. 🇬🇷: Mt. xix. 11; Μk. v. 39; Jn. vii. 16; 1 Co. i. 17: vii. 10, 19 [🇬🇷]; 2 Co. vii. 9; 1 Tim. v. 23 [🇬🇷], etc. By a rhetorical construction 🇬🇷 sometimes is logically equiv. to not so much as: Mk. ix. 37 (🇬🇷) Mt. x. 20; Jn. xii. 44; Acts v. 4; 1 Co. xv. 10; 1 Th. iv. 8; by this form of speech the emphasis is laid on the second member; cf. Fritzsche on Mk. p. 773 sqq.; W. § 55, 8 b.; [B. 356 (306)]. 🇬🇷 not only but also: Jn. v. 18; xi. 52 [🇬🇷, etc.]; Ro. i. 32, and very often. When 🇬🇷 is omitted (as in the Lat. non solum sed), the gradation is strengthened: Acts xix. 26 [Lchm. adds 🇬🇷]; 1 Jn. ν. 6: 🇬🇷, Phil. ii. 12; cf. Fritzsche l. c. p. 786 sqq.; W. 498 (464); [B. 369 sq. (317)]. &emsp; 2. The negation to which 🇬🇷 pertains is suppressed, but can easily be supplied upon reflection [W. 442 (412)]: Mt. xi. 7-9; Lk. vii. 24-26, (in each passage, before 🇬🇷 supply ‘you will say you did not go out into the wilderness for this purpose’); Acts xix. 2 (we have not received the Holy Spirit, but ); Gal. ii. 3 (they said not one word in opposition to me, but ); 2 Co. vii. 11 (where before 🇬🇷, repeated six times by anaphora, supply 🇬🇷 with the accus. of the preceding word). It is used in answers to questions having the force of a negation [W. 442 (412)]: Jn. vii. 49; Acts xv.11; 1 Co. x. 20. 🇬🇷 [or 🇬🇷, cf. W. 40; B. 10] elliptical after a negation [W. 316 sq. (297); 620 (576); Fritzsche on Mt. p. 840 sq.]: Jn. i. 8 (supply 🇬🇷); ix. 3 (🇬🇷 [or 🇬🇷], 🇬🇷); Mk. iv. 22 (🇬🇷). [“The best Mss. seem to elide the final 🇬🇷 before nouns, but not before verbs” Scrivener, Plain Introduction, etc., p. 14; but see Dr. Gregory’s full exhibition of the facts in Τdf. Proleg. p. 93 sq. from which it appears that “elision is commonly or almost always omitted before 🇬🇷, almost always before 🇬🇷, often before 🇬🇷 and 🇬🇷, rarely before 🇬🇷 and 🇬🇷, never before 🇬🇷; and it should be noticed that this coincides with the fact that the familiar words 🇬🇷, prefer the form 🇬🇷”; see also WH. App. p. 146. Cf. W. § 5, 1 a.; B. p. 10.]

🇬🇷: fut. 🇬🇷; 1 aor. 🇬🇷: 2 fut. pass. 🇬🇷; (🇬🇷); [fr. Aeschyl. down]; to change: to cause one thing to cease and another to take its place, 🇬🇷, Acts vi. 14; 🇬🇷 to vary the voice, i. e. to speak in a different manner according to the different conditions of minds, to adapt the matter and form of discourse to mental moods, to treat them now severely, now gently, Gal. iv. 20 [but see Meyer ad loc.]. to exchange one thing for another: 🇬🇷, Ro. i. 23 ( Ps. cv. (cvi.) 20; the Greeks say 🇬🇷 [cf. W. 206 (194), 388 (363); Vaughan on Rom. l. c.]). to transform: 1 Co. xv. 51 sq.; Heb. i. 12. [.: 🇬🇷.]*

🇬🇷, adv., from another place: Jn. x. 1 (i. q. 🇬🇷 [which the grammarians prefer, Thom. Mag. ed. Ritschl p. 10, 13; Moeris ed. Piers. p. 11]; cf. 🇬🇷, 🇬🇷). [(Antiph., al.)]*

🇬🇷, adv., i. q. 🇬🇷, elsewhere, in another place: Mk. i. 38 (T Tr txt. WH Tr mrg. br.). Cf. Bornemann in the Stud. u. Krit. for 1843, p. 127 sq. [Soph., Xen., al; see Thom. M. and Moer. as in the preced. word.]*

🇬🇷, 🇬🇷: [pres. pass. ptcp. 🇬🇷]; i. e. 🇬🇷, 🇬🇷, “aliud verbis, aliud sensu ostendo” (Quint. instt. 8, 6, 44), to speak allegorically or in a figure: Gal. iv. 24. (Philo, Joseph., Plut., and gram. writ.: [cf. Mey. on Gal. l. c.].)*

🇬🇷, [WH. 🇬🇷 and 🇬🇷; see Intr. § 408], Hebr. , praise ye the Lord, Hallelujah: Rev. xix. 1, 3 sq. 6. [Sept. Pss. passim; Tob. xiii. 18; 3 Macc. vii. 13.]*

🇬🇷, gen. plur. [no nom. being possible]; dat. 🇬🇷; acc. 🇬🇷, one another; reciprocally, mutually: Mt. xxiv. 10; Jn. xiii. 35; Acts xxviii. 25; Ro. i. 12; Jas. v. 16; Rev. vi. 4, and often. [Fr. Hom. down.]

🇬🇷, 🇬🇷, (🇬🇷 and 🇬🇷), sprung from another race, a foreigner, alien: Lk. xvii. 18. (In Sept. [Gen. xvii. 27; Ex. xii. 43, etc.], but nowhere in prof. writ.)*

🇬🇷, impf. 🇬🇷; aor. 🇬🇷 and 🇬🇷 (Bttm. Ausf. Spr. ii. p. 108; [W. 82 (79); B. 54 (47)]); to leap (Lat. salio); Acts iii. 8; xiv. 10 (Rec. 🇬🇷;