Page:A Genealogical and Heraldic Dictionary of the Peerage and Baronetage of the British Empire Chunk 2.djvu/168

 P A K then twenty-three years of age, was found one of the en- prieoncr, committed to the Tower, and fined £2006: Lad heirs of Sir John Baldwin (who ii. ii Dec. in the same his estate sequestered, his hossae in Buckinghaniehice (one year). He received the henour of knighthood from Queen of Ihe best is that oonnty) levelled su ith the ground, and MARY, and on the death of his uncle, the said Sir John Baldwin, eucceeded to a groat estatin ITe was sheriff of Worcesten’hire, in the 3rd ef Er,izanrvsl, and dsing 2 June, amounts to £20,348. His zeal in the loyal cause never 371, at Bath-place Ilelborn, was conveyed in great perup swerved, for notwitbstaudiuag he had suffered so much for te Aileehury, the officers of the ilollege of Arms attending, and hurled in the parish church there. Ills wife, who survived him, and s;. lndly, Thomas Tashmareb, Esq., was taken prisoner thers, yet was so popular, that when afterwards the dsu. of Sir Thomas Kiteon, Knt. of Hengrave, in Suffolk, and by her he had surviving Issue, Jolts (Sin, his heir. Mary, ma. lii Sir Walter 1.eng, lInt. <if W’neeall and Drayeet5 ued for the said fine, to convey the market-house, the in W’illslurr, 31.1’. for that i’ennly. Catherine, ol. 1st, Is Isbn Davis, Esii., if the sante cs; psi-eel of the estate at Aieabury, to Thomas Scot (who was Incur, to sin Jasper 31 sore 1 soil irdly, 55 Sir — llesupesssn, cue of the king’s judges), and other trustees, for the nec of of ‘tril’lingssn. Margaret, <a. to Thsmss Litelsfielil, Iisq. He was s. by his cnn, Sin Jolla I’ansauninc, KB. one of the privy council, and n-see made void. Sir John ma. Dorothy, one of the dans. an especial favourite ef Queen liLiZtnrrn. The queen lirst of his guardian, Thomas, Lord Coveutsy, and by her, who took notice of Sir John in her progress to Worcester, when was the reputed author of T0 lVhele Duly of Man, and she invited hins to attend her court, svhere he lived at his othsr escellent werke, had, with two dane. (the eldest own expense, in groat splendessr and reputation, with an ma. to Anthony Eyre, Esq. ef Hampton, Netta; the younger, squipage not inferior to some of the highest officers, although to William Oodfrey, Req. of Linsolushire), an only eon, his he had no greater honour than Knight of the Bath, which successor, at his deceass, 13 Jan. 1600, was conferred upon him in the lifetime of his father. Tie 111. Sun Joun FAnmNuvoN, SIP, for Worcestershire, fosup. was s’emarkable for his stature and comely persen, and had King CuAntEs It. and King JAsmn.s 11., who ma. Margaret, distinguished himsell cc nusrh by his naanly exercises, that dais. ef Sir John lfcyt, BarL of Ebringtou, in Gloucesterehire, be was called “Lusty l’akington.” Sir John Pakington us. child, the daughter of Humphry Smith, of Chea1iside, Queen IV. Sin JonN PAscmauvoN. This gentleman was a strenuuens Erszancru’s eilkmsu, of an ancient family in Leicestershire. The lady was the widow of Benedict Barnham, Esq., an in the year 1702, preferrsd that remarkable complaint to alderman of London, “who left her very rich, and that ths house of Cenamons, against William. Lord bishop of oensideratien, together with her youth and beauty, made it Worcester, and Br. Lloyd, his son, for interfering in the iuiposib1e for her to escape the addresses oven of the election of the county of Worcester, by aending threatening greatest persons about the court; but Sir John was the letters to the clergy and frseholders, and aspersing his only happy man who know how ts gain her, being recentmended conduct in parliament. Sir John was constantly elected by his worthy friend, Mr. William Soabright. townclerk one of the knights for Wercestorshire in every parliament, of Londen, cvho had purrhased the suanor of Bssford, from his first being chosen, at nineteen years of age (except in Worceotershire. ‘this lady had by her first husband four one, whet he voluntarily declined it), to his death, notwithstanding daughters, who were very young whon they lest their father, and therefore noedod a faithful friend to manage him. He sum. 1st, Frances, eldest dan. of Sir Honey Parker, and improve their fortuinen, in which capacity Sir John Hart. of hienington, eo. Warwick, by whom he had two anqstitted himself so henourably, that they had ten thousand sons, Jebn and Thomas, who both a. young and unmarried, peunds each for portion, an immonne sum in those and two dsue., viz., daye.* Sir John Pakingten had issue, one son and two Tiargaret. daus., vie., Josux, Ins lirir. Anne. iii. Its, to Sir Iliunplurey Peivors, lfoi. af Tamworth; Sir John u-n. lndly, Hester, daughter and sole heir of Sir and dadly, Is T’Silip, 1st Earl of Chcslerfinl,l. Mary, m. Is Sir ltsbent ltreslcc, of Naclen, in Suffolk, masicr Herbert Perrott, Hut. of Haroldstono, in ths county of of she ceremonies to King Joases I. This great suan, who lived to see his children’s children, dcparted this life at his house at Westwood, in the seventy- seventh year of his age, in January, 1623, his widow rn interred with his ancestors, at Hampton-Lovet, and a. by ardly, Lord Kilmorey, and ‘ithly, Thomae, Earl of Holly. his son, His eon and heir, 1. Sin Jouw PAKINuTON, Ban, of Ailesbnry, in the co. county of Worcester, who us. in 1721, Elizabeth, dan. Bucks, created II Jnne, 1620, ci. Frances, daughter of Sir of John Conyers, Esq. of Walthametew, in Easex, and had John Ferrers, Knt. of Tsmuworth, and by that lady, who ma. Sndiy, Alexander Lesley, Earl of Lcven, had HEaBEav-Paasovv, } Gilt and 7th bsronets. (with a dan. who ma. 1st, Colonel Washington, and lndly, Samuel Sandye, Eeq. of Omberslsy, in the county of Worcester) an only eon. Jonne. Sir John resided at Ailesbury, and was elected to parliament by that borough, in son, VI. Sun JOHN PzKiNnToN, who ma- in 3761, hTary, dan. the 21st of J.sasrs I., but ci. at the early age of twenty- of Henry Bray, Req. of Bromyard, in Herefordshire, but four, in Oct. 1621, previonoly to his father, and was 3, by ci. a. p. 30 November, 1762, when be was z. by his hie eon, II. SIR JnsuN PknmNnronc, who at the decease of his brother. grandfather inlasrited the sstates of the family, and resided snheeqnently at Weatwood. Tie was then in his fifth year, and under the gnardiuunohip of Lord Corentry, the then lord keeper, “by whose vigilant care of his education, both hy travel and ether advantages, he because a most accompliohed s. Jeusmni, his smuceesuem’. Ti. Tliemuss, sO. s.p. gentleman.” Ho was elected one of the knights u. Em,seasersu, si. te William hlisusell, Esq. of Powiek, in for Worcestershire. in the 15th Cuans,cs I., and when the rebellion broke out, n-se member for Aileshury’ and having en all occasions given preofs both of his fidelity to the crown end the sights of the subjoct, was entrusted by the king, in 1642, with a commiesion for arraying men for his Is. Dorothy, deceased. its. ANNE. iv. Louisa, deceased. service in Worcestershire, on account of which he was taken Sir tterbsrt ci. at Bath, in 3705, and was a. by Lie son, These ladies wire ma., 11w eldest, to Lerd Auchlsv; the led, VIII. Sun Jonne PAIeIN0TON, DCL., t. in 1760, who d.c. a. Amen, Is Sir Francis Ilacos, the ci’lsbratrd chancellsr, created 6 Jan. 3630, when the title bocame m<xvsnscv. The estates Viscount St. Athans; the 1n1, Is Sic William Sosauss; and the yonsgesl, to Sir William Cenotable, deecended to JonN-StusasoeeT RusseLL, Esq. (son of Elleabeth, 870 P A K such great wastes eosnmitted in his woods, that an estimate of the lose, still remaining in the hand-writing of his lady his loyally, he had the courage to join King Cusacee TI. with a troop of horse, at the battle of Woecseter, and was tried for hie life, not one witness could ho procured to swear against him : he was consequently acquitted and net at liberty, but was afterwards fined £7670, and eosupe tolls, tho eourt-leet, and certain grounds called Heyden hill, the towu, which they kept until after the Eestemtion, when, by a special act of pariiameut, the said conveyances and d. in Starch, 1620, whsn he was e. by He only asserter of the rights and liberties of the country, and the powerful opposition generally made against gs’auceu, usc. to Thsmaa-Charlee, Viseeunt Tracey, of Ireland. Pembroke, and by that lady bad a son, bIcanEaT-PERROTT, his euucc0500u-. This gentleman, who was the original of Addison’s Sir Roger de Coverloy, d. i:i Aug. 1727, was V. Sin HrnnEav-Prannvv PARIN5ITON, H.P. for the issue, ITesles’. Cecilia. He ci. 24 Sept. 1740, at Leyden, and wae a by his elder VII. Sin HEnncnT-Peanovv PAKINOTen, who ma. in 1759, Elizabeth, dau. of Cieear hawkins. Req., and relict of Herbert Wylde, Esq. of Ludlow, in the county of Salop, and by that lady (who ci. 25 Feb. 1511), had issue, lIme ronmuly of Worcester, and dying in hay, 0613, left a sen, Juusns-Sesiaaser Resent, who ausumuod the snrnseme of I’AETNCTos, on the death of ths Otis baceuet, and was hims,’lf evealed a baronel in lSl6. Sir John PakingtenYe eldest sietsr), and to Anne