Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/23

 *A copy of some of the ASTM standards as republished bby [sic] Defendant in HTML format; see Wise Decl., Ex. 165, ECF Nos. 198-5, 198-48;
 * A copy of some of the NFPA standards as republished by Defendant on the Internet Archive, see Wise Decl., Ex.Exs. [sic] 166–68, ECF Nos. 198-5, 198-48;
 * A copy of the cover sheets Defendant attached to the ASHRAE standards it republished on the Internet Archive, see Wise Decl., Ex. 169, ECF Nos. 198-5, 198-48; and
 * Arguments as to how each standard has (or has not) been incorporated by reference into law, see Def.’s 2d MSJ at 9–10; Becker Decl. ¶ 57, Exs. [sic] 89–91; Supp. Wise Decl., Exs. 175–176.

Before turning to each of the four factors, and the court’s standard-by-standard analysis, the court first distinguishes between standards that have and have not been incorporated by reference into law.

For each of the 217 standards at issue, Defendant provided the court with what it contends is the incorporating-by-reference regulation. See Becker Decl. ¶ 57, Ex.Exs. [sic] 89–91. For 153 of the 217 standards, Defendant provided at least one regulation incorporating into law the standard Defendant published. These are identified in the attached Appendix as “Group 1 Standards.” As to the other 64 standards, Defendant cited to a regulation that incorporated a standard bearing a different designation than the one it published.