Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/114

 #ASTM D1335 1967 (1972):
 * 1) *The parties identify 24 C.F.R. § 200.94 (2015) as the incorporating by reference regulation, see Becker Decl. ¶ 57, Ex. 90; Wise Decl., Ex. 176, which incorporates the standard but not for any specific regulation. Section 200.945 requires that all carpet “shall be designed, manufactured, and tested in compliance with,” among other standards, ASTM D1336. The regulation does not specify that only certain provisions of ASTM D1335 1967 (1972) are incorporated by reference into law, nor does it indicate which specific provisions of ASTM D1335 1967 (1972) are relevant for compliance with the regulation.
 * 2) * First Factor : There is no indication that Defendant stands to profit from republishing this standard; Defendant’s apparent purpose is to inform the public about the law and facilitate public debate. See ASTM, 896 F.3d at 449; Def’s 2d Mot. at 16. Defendant’s “attempt to freely distribute standards incorporated by reference into law qualifie[s] as a use that further[s] the purposes of the fair use defense.” ASTM, 896 F.3d at 449. Further, the incorporated standard provides information essential for a private entity to comprehend its legal duties, which weighs heavily in favor of permitting Defendant’s reproduction. See ASTM, 896 F.3d at 450.
 * 3) * Second Factor : The “express text of the law falls plainly outside the realm of copyright protection.” ASTM, 896 F.3d at 451. Here, the standard is incorporated into law without limitation such that “the consequence of the incorporation by reference is virtually indistinguishable from a situation in which the standard had been expressly copied into law.” Id. at 452. Accordingly, “this factor weighs heavily in favor of fair use.” Id.
 * 4) * Third Factor : The incorporating regulation does not specify that only certain provisions of this standard are incorporated by reference into law, nor does it indicate which specific provisions of the standard are relevant for regulatory compliance, suggesting that “a greater amount of the standard’s text might be fairly reproduced.” Id.
 * 5) * Fourth Factor : Defendant’s reproductions have not had a “substantially adverse impact on the potential market for the originals,” nor have Plaintiffs shown by a preponderance of the evidence that there is a meaningful likelihood of future harm.” Memo Op. at 30–36 (internal quotation and citation marks omitted).
 * 6) * Conclusion : Defendant may fairly reproduce this incorporated standard in its entirety.
 * 7) ASTM D1480 1993 (1997):
 * 8) *The parties identify 40 C.F.R. § 75.6 (2010) as the incorporating by reference regulation, see Becker Decl. ¶ 57, Ex. 90; Wise Decl., Ex. 176, which incorporates the standard into appendix D. That section, in turn, requires that where “the flowmeter records volumetric flow rate rather than mass flow rate, analyze oil samples to determine the density or specific gravity of the oil. Determine the density or specific gravity of the oil sample in accordance with,” several standards, including ASTM D1480. The regulation does not specify that only certain provisions of ASTM D1480 1993 (1997) are incorporated by reference into law, nor does it indicate which specific provisions of ASTM D1480 1993 (1997) are relevant for compliance with the regulation.