Page:ASTM v. PRO (D.D.C. 2022).pdf/113

 on the potential market for the originals,” nor have Plaintiffs shown by a preponderance of the evidence that there is a meaningful likelihood of future harm.” Memo Op. at 30–36 (internal quotation and citation marks omitted).
 * 1) * Conclusion : Defendant may fairly reproduce this incorporated standard in its entirety.
 * 2) ASTM D129 (1995):
 * 3) *The parties identify 40 C.F.R. § 60.17 (2011) as the incorporating by reference regulation, see Becker Decl. ¶ 57, Ex. 90; Wise Decl., Ex. 176, which incorporates the standard into 40 C.F.R. §§ 60.106(j)(2), 60.335(b)(10)(i), and appendix A: Method 19, 12.5.2.2.3. Section 60.106(j)(2) requires the use of ASTM D129-95, or one of eleven other standards, for separately analyzing “[f]resh feed samples.” See 42 C.F.R. §§ 60.106(j)(2). Section 60.335(b)(10)(i) only references ASTM D129 (2000), and not the 1995 version that Defendant published. See id. § 60.335(b)(10)(i). Section appendix A, Method 19 requires the use of ASTM D129, or one of four other standards, “to determine the sulfur content (%S)” for a particular sample and analysis. See id. § appendix A, Method 19 at 12.5.2.2.3. In addition, Section 60.4415 requires the use of ASTM D129 for analyzing samples of total sulfur content using liquid fuels. See id. § 60.4415(a)(i). These regulations do not specify that only certain provisions of ASTM D129 (1995) are incorporated by reference into law, nor do they indicate which specific provisions of ASTM D129 (1995) are relevant for compliance with the regulation.
 * 4) * First Factor : There is no indication that Defendant stands to profit from republishing this standard; Defendant’s apparent purpose is to inform the public about the law and facilitate public debate. See ASTM, 896 F.3d at 449; Def’s 2d Mot. at 16. Defendant’s “attempt to freely distribute standards incorporated by reference into law qualifie[s] as a use that further[s] the purposes of the fair use defense.” ASTM, 896 F.3d at 449. Further, the incorporated standard provides information essential for a private entity to comprehend its legal duties, which weighs heavily in favor of permitting Defendant’s reproduction. See ASTM, 896 F.3d at 450.
 * 5) * Second Factor : The “express text of the law falls plainly outside the realm of copyright protection.” ASTM, 896 F.3d at 451. Here, the standard is incorporated into law without limitation such that “the consequence of the incorporation by reference is virtually indistinguishable from a situation in which the standard had been expressly copied into law.” Id. at 452. Accordingly, “this factor weighs heavily in favor of fair use.” Id.
 * 6) * Third Factor : The incorporating regulation does not specify that only certain provisions of this standard are incorporated by reference into law, nor does it indicate which specific provisions of the standard are relevant for regulatory compliance, suggesting that “a greater amount of the standard’s text might be fairly reproduced.” Id.
 * 7) * Fourth Factor : Defendant’s reproductions have not had a “substantially adverse impact on the potential market for the originals,” nor have Plaintiffs shown by a preponderance of the evidence that there is a meaningful likelihood of future harm.” Memo Op. at 30–36 (internal quotation and citation marks omitted).
 * 8) * Conclusion : Defendant may fairly reproduce this incorporated standard in its entirety.