Page:AASHO USRN 1928-06-01.pdf/2

5 # The request for the duplicate marking of the road from Philip to Rapid City, South Dakota, was disapproved.
 * 1) The request by Kansas for a U. S. number between Springfield, Missouri, and Two Buttes, Colorado was disapproved. Missouri and Colorado did not join in the request.
 * 2) Under date of February 6th, the Executive Committee approved by letter ballot the request for a change in the numbering of United States No. 6 in New York so as to read; "NEW YORK, beginning at the Connecticut-New York State line at Mill Plain via Brewster, Mahopac, Peekskill, Highland Falls, Central Valley, Monroe, Goshen, State Hill to Port Jervis," and United States No. 6 North, the route formerly designated United States No. 6 from Port Jervis via Wurtsboro, Ellenville to Kingston shall be known as United States 6 North.On motion the Secretary was authorized to record the following ballots taken by the Association since the last meeting of the Executive Committee:
 * 3) Marking on Pavements at Railroad Grade Crossings.V otingVoting [sic] YES, 35
 * 4) *Alabama
 * 5) *Arizona
 * 6) *California
 * 7) *Colorado
 * 8) *Delaware
 * 9) *Georgia
 * 10) *Idaho
 * 11) *Indiana
 * 12) *Kansas
 * 13) *Kentucky
 * 14) *Maryland
 * 15) *Massachusetts
 * 16) *Michigan
 * 17) *Minnesota
 * 18) *Mississippi
 * 19) *Missouri
 * 20) *Montana
 * 21) *Nebraska
 * 22) *Nevada
 * 23) *New Hampshire
 * 24) *New Mexico
 * 25) *North Carolina
 * 26) *North Dakota
 * 27) *Ohio
 * 28) *Oklahoma
 * 29) *Oregon
 * 30) *Pennsylvania
 * 31) *Rhode Island
 * 32) *South Dakota
 * 33) *Texas
 * 34) *Utah
 * 35) *Vermont
 * 36) *Washington
 * 37) *West Virginia
 * 38) *WisconsinVoting NO, 4.
 * 39) *Connecticut
 * 40) *Illinois
 * 41) *Iowa
 * 42) *VirginiaNot voting, 11
 * 43) *Arkansas
 * 44) *Florida
 * 45) *Louisiana
 * 46) *Maine
 * 47) *New Jersey
 * 48) *New York
 * 49) *South Carolina
 * 50) *Tennessee
 * 51) *Wyoming
 * 52) *Bureau of Public Roads
 * 53) *Hawaii
 * 54) That on pavements ten feet shall be considered as the standard width for each traffic lane.Voting Yes, 29.
 * 55) *Alabama
 * 56) *Arizona
 * 57) *California
 * 58) *Colorado
 * 59) *Delaware
 * 60) *Idaho
 * 61) *Iowa
 * 62) *Kentucky
 * 63) *Massachusetts
 * 64) *Michigan
 * 65) *Minnesota
 * 66) *Mississippi
 * 67) *Missouri
 * 68) *Montana
 * 69) *Nevada
 * 70) *New Hampshire
 * 71) *New Mexico
 * 72) *North Carolina
 * 73) *North Dakota
 * 74) *Ohio
 * 75) *Oklahoma
 * 76) *Oregon
 * 77) *Pennsylvania
 * 78) *Rhode Island
 * 79) *Utah
 * 80) *Vermont
 * 81) *Washington
 * 82) *West Virginia
 * 83) *WisconsinVoting NO, 1O
 * 84) *Connecticut
 * 85) *Georgia
 * 86) *Illinois
 * 87) *Kansas
 * 88) *Indiana
 * 89) *Maryland
 * 90) *Nebraska
 * 91) *Texas
 * 92) *Virginia
 * 93) *Wyoming