Page:29357 2016 1 1501 44512 Judgement 11-May-2023.pdf/26

PART C exclusion”. Justice Chandrachud interpreted the term to mean that the Legislative Assembly of NCTD shall have the power to legislate on any subject in the State or Concurrent Lists, except the excluded subjects.

25. In his concurring opinion in the 2018 Constitution Bench judgment, Justice Bhushan also interpreted the said phrase in the following terms:

“551. The provision is very clear which empowers the Legislative Assembly to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in the State List or in the Concurrent List except the excluded entries. One of the issue is that power to make laws in State List or in Concurrent List is hedged by phrase "in so far as any such matter is applicable to Union territories".

552. A look of the Entries in List II and List III indicates that there is no mention of Union '''Territory. A perusal of the List II and III indicates''' that although in various entries there is specific mention of word "State" but there is no express reference of "Union Territory" in any of the entries. For example, in List II Entry 12, 26, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 43, there is specific mention of word "State". Similarly, in List III Entry 3, 4 and 43 there is mention of word "State". The above phrase "in so far as any such matter is applicable to '''Union Territory" is inconsequential. The''' '''reasons are two fold. On the commencement of''' the Constitution, there was no concept of Union Territories and there were only Part A, B, C and '''D States. After Seventh Constitutional''' Amendment, where First Schedule as well as Article 2 of the Constitution were amended which included mention of Union Territory both '''in Article 1 as well as in First Schedule. Thus,''' the above phrase was used to facilitate the automatic conferment of powers to make laws for Delhi on all matters including those relatable to the State List and Concurrent List except where an entry indicates that its applicability to the Union Territory is excluded by implication or any express Constitutional provision.