Page:1902 Encyclopædia Britannica - Volume 27 - CHI-ELD.pdf/467

 DESTRUCTORS

425

suffers from the objection that the motion of the bars tends to allow fine particles to drop through unburnt. Some difficulty has been experienced from the refuse sticking in the hopper, and exception may also be taken to the continual flapping of the door when the clinker passes out, as cold air is thereby admitted into the furnace. As in the Fryer cell, the outlet for the products of combustion into the main flue is close to the point where the crude refuse is fed into the furnace, and the escape of unburnt vapours is thus facilitated. Forced draught is applied by means of a Root’s blower. The Manchester Corporation has 28 cells of this type in use, and the approximate amount of refuse burnt per cell per 24 hours is from 6 to 8 tons at a cost per ton for labour of 3‘47 pence. Horsfall’s destructor3 (Fig. 2) is a high-temperature furnace usua of modern type which has been adopted largely in Great Britain a rectangular block of brickwork having a flat top, upon which the and on the continent of Europe. In it some of the fforsfajj>Sm house refuse is tipped from the carts. Each cell measures internally general features of the Fryer cell are retained, but the details differ considerably from those of the furnaces already described. Important points in the design are the arrangement

Healey, Thwaite, Young, Wilkinson, Burton, Hardie, Jacobs and Odo-en/ In addition to these the “Beehive” and the “Nelson” destructors became well known. The former was introduced by Stafford and Pearson of Burnley, and one was erected in 1884 in the parish yard at Richmond, Surrey, but the results being unsatisfactory, it was closed during the following year. The “Nelson” furnace, patented in 1885 by Messrs Richmond and Birtwistle, was erected at Nelson-in-Marsden, Lancashire, but being very costly in working, was abandoned. The principal types of destructors nowin use are those of Fryer, Whiley, Horsfall, Warner, Meldrum, and Beaman and Deas. The general arrangement of the destructor patented1 by Mr Alfred Fryer in 1876 is illustrated in Fig. 1. An installation upon principle consists of aback number of furnaces or cells, Fryer ,s. this Hy arranged in pairs to back, and enclosed in

about 9 feet by 5 feet, and is covered by a firebrick arch 3 feet 6 inches high above the grates. The furnaces have cast-iron furnace mouths, with doors 5 feet wide hinged at the top to open outvrards with balance weights. The furnace bottom has an inclination of 1 in 3, from front to back, the rearmost portion, for a width of 4 feet, forming a firebrick hearth or dead plate, and the lower part, having a width of 5 feet, consisting of fire-bars. A wall at the back end of the cells divides each furnace into halves. On one side is a passage forming an opening into the main flue for the escape of the products of combustion, whilst on the other the upper end of the slope is carried up with a steeper inclination to a “feeding hole” for the admission of refuse from the platform above. A large main flue, which also forms the dust chamber, is placed underneath the furnace hearths. The Fryer furnace ordinarily burns from 4 to 6 tons of refuse per cell per 24 hours. It will be observed that the outlets for the products of combustion are placed at the back near the refuse feed opening, an arrangement which is imperfect in design, inasmuch as while a charge of refuse is burning upon the furnace bars the charge which is to follow lies on the dead hearth near the outlet flue. Here it undergoes drying and partial decomposition, giving off offensive empyreumatic vapours which pass into the flue without being exposed to sufficient heat to render them entirely inoffensive. The serious nuisances thus produced in some instances led to the introduction of a second furnace, or “cremator,” patented by Mr C. Jones of Ealing in 1885, which was placed in the main flue leading to the chimney-shaft, for the purpose of resolving the organic matters present in the vapour, but the greatly increased cost of burning due to this device led to its abandonment in many cases. This type of cell was largely used during the early period of the history of destructors, but of recent years has to a considerable extent given place to furnaces of more modern design. A furnace patented2 in 1891, by Mr Henry Whiley, superintendent of the scavenging department of the Manchester Corpora011 13 au ma c Whiley •s‘ ^i ’ t°withti a inview its to action and has been designed primarily saving labour—the cells being fed, stoked, and clinkered automatically. There is no drying hearth, and the refuse carts tip direct into a shoot or hopper at the back which conducts the material directly on to movable eccentric grate bars. These automatically traverse the material forward into the furnace, and finally push it against a flap-door which opens and allows it to fall out. This apparatus is adapted for dealing with screened rather than unscreened refuse, since it Patent No. 3125 (1876).

Patent No. 8271 (1891).

of the flues and flue outlets for the products of combustion, and the introduction of a blast duct through which air is forced into a closed ash-pit. The feeding-hole is situated at the back of and above the furnace, while the flue opening for the emission of the gaseous products is placed at the front of the furnace over the dead plate ; thus the gases distilled from the raw refuse are caused to pass on their way to the main flue over the hottest part of the furnace and through the flue opening in the red-hot reverberatory arch. The steam jet, which plays an important part in the Horsfall furnace, forces air into the closed ash-pit at a pressure of about f to 1 inch of water, and in this way a temperature varying from 1500° to 1900° F., as tested by a thermoelectric pyrometer, is maintained in the main flue. In a battery of cells the gases from each are delivered into one main flue, so that a uniform temperature is maintained therein sufficiently high to prevent noxious vapours from reaching the chimney. The cells being charged and clinkered in rotation, when the fire in one is green, in the others it is at its hottest, and the products of combustion do not reach the boiler surfaces until after they have been mixed in the main flue. The cast-iron boxes which are provided at the sides of the furnaces, and through which the blast air is conveyed on its way to the grate, prevent the adhesion of clinker to the side walls of the cells, and very materially preserve the brickwork, which otherwise becomes damaged by the tools used to remove the clinker. The wide clinkering doors are suspended by counterbalance weights and open vertically. The rate of working of these cells varies from 8 tons per cell per 24 hours at Oldham to 10 tons per cell at Bradford, where the furnaces are of the latest type. The cost of labour in stoking and clinkering is about 6d. per ton of the refuse treated at Bradford, and 9d. per ton at Oldham, where the rate of wages is higher. Well-constructed and properly-worked plants of this type should give rise to no nuisance, and may be located in populous neighbourhoods without danger to the public health or comfort. Warner’s destructor,4 known as the “Perfectus,” is, in general arrangement, similar to Fryer’s, but differs in being provided with special charging hoppers, dampers in flues, dust- yyartier's catching arrangements, rocking grate- bars and other improvements. The refuse is tipped into feeding-hoppers, consisting of rectangular cast-iron boxes over which plates are placed to prevent the escape of smoke and fumes. At the lower portion of the feeding-hopper is a flap-door working on an axis and controlled by an iron lever from the tipping platform. When refuse is to be fed into the furnace the lever is thrown over, the contents of the hopper drop on to the sloping firebrick hearth beneath, and the door is at once closed again. The door should Patent No. 8999 4(1887); No. 14,709 (1888); No. 22,531 (1891). Patent No. 18,719 (1888). S. III. - 54