Page:1902 Encyclopædia Britannica - Volume 27 - CHI-ELD.pdf/411

 DANCING gives the following description of the Cushion Dance:— “ The dance is begun by a single person, man or woman, who, taking a cushion in hand, dances about the room, and at the end of a short time stops and sings : ‘ This dance it will no farther go,’ to which the musician answers : £ I pray you, good sir, why say sol’ ‘Because Joan Sanderson will not come to.’ ‘She must come to whether she will or no,’ returns the musician, and then the dancer lays the cushion before a woman; she kneels and he kisses her, singing ‘ Welcome, Joan Sanderson.’ Then she rises, takes up the cushion, and both dance and sing ‘ Prinkum prankum is a fine dance, and shall we go dance it over again l’ Afterwards the woman takes the cushion and does as the man did.” Other popular dances—generally adapted to the tunes of popular songs, the nature of some of which may be guessed from their titles—were the Trenchmore, Omnium-gatherum, Tolly-polly, Hoite cum toite, Dull Sir John, Paine I would, Sillinger, All in a Garden Green, An Old Man’s a Bed Full of Bones, If All the World were Paper, John, Come Kiss Me Now, Cuckholds All Awry, Green Sleeves and Pudding Pies, Lumps of Pudding, Under and Over, Up Tails All, The Slaughter House, Rub her Down with Straw, Have at thy Coat Old Woman, The Happy Marriage, Dissembling Love, Sweet Kate, Once I Loved a Maiden Fair. Dancing practically disappeared during the Puritan regime, but with the Restoration it again became popular. It underwent no considerable developments, however, until the reign of Queen Anne, when the glories of Bath were revived in the beginning of the 18th century, and Beau Nash drew up his famous codes of rules for the regulation of dress and manners, and founded the balls in which the polite French dances completely eclipsed the simpler English ones. An account of a dancing lesson witnessed by a fond parent at this time is worth quoting, as it shows how far the writer (but not his daughter) had departed from the jolly, romping traditions of the old English dances :— “As the best institutions are liable to corruption, so, sir, I must acquaint you that very great abuses are crept into this entertainment. I was amazed to see my girl handed by and handing young fellows with so much familiarity, and I could not have thought it had been my child. They very often made use of a most impudent and lascivious step called setting to partners, which I know not how to describe to you but by telling you that it is the very reverse of bach to bach. At last an impudent young dog bid the fiddlers play a dance called Moll Patley, and, after having made two or three capers, ran to his partner, locked his arms in hers, and whisked her round cleverly above ground in such a manner that I, who sat upon one of the lowest benches, saw farther above her shoe than I can think fit to acquaint you with. I could no longer endure these enormities, wherefore, just as my girl was going to be made a whirligig, I ran in, seized my child, and carried her home.” What we may call polite dancing, when it became fashionable, soon invaded London, its first home being Madame Cornely’s famous Carlisle House in Soho Square. Ranelagh and Vauxhall and Almack’s were all extensively patronized, and the rage for magnificent entertainment and dancing culminated in the erection of the palatial Pantheon in Oxford Street—a place so universally patronized that even Dr Johnson was to be found there. White’s and Boodle’s were also famous assembly rooms, but the most exclusive of all these establishments was Almack’s, the original of Brooks’s Club. The only true national dances of Scotland are reels, strathspeys, and flings, while in Ireland there is but one dance—the jig, which is there, however, found in many varieties and expressive of many shades of emotion, from the maddest gaiety to the wildest lament. Curiously

375

enough, although the Welsh dance often, they have no strictly national dances. Dancing in present - day society is a comparatively simple affair, as five-sixths of almost all ball programmes consists of Waltzes. The origin of the Waltz is a muchdebated subject, the French, Italians, and Bavarians each claiming for their respective countries the honour of having given birth to it. As a matter of fact the Waltz, as it is now danced, comes from Germany; but it is equally true that its real origin is French, since it is a development of the Volte, which in its turn came from the Lavolta of Provence, one of the most ancient of French dances. The Lavolta was fashionable in the 16th century, and was the delight of the Valois court. The Volte danced by Henry III. was really a Valse a deux pas; and Castil-Blaze says that “ the waltz which we took again from the Germans in 1795 had been a French dance for four hundred years.” The change, it is true, came upon it during its visit to Germany, hence the theory of its German origin. The first German waltz tune is dated 1770—“Ach! du lieber Augustin.” It was first danced at the Paris opera in 1793, in Gardel’s ballet La Dansomanie. It was introduced to English ballrooms in 1812, when it roused a storm of ridicule and opposition, but it became popular when danced at Almack’s by the Emperor Alexander in 1816. The Waltz a trois temps has a sliding step in which the movements of the knees play an important part. The tempo is moderate, so as to allow three distinct movements on the three beats of each bar; and the Waltz is written in 3-4 time and in eight bar sentences. Walking up and down the room and occasionally breaking into the step of the dance is not true waltzing, and the habit of pushing one’s partner backwards along the room is an entirely English one. But the dancer must be able to waltz equally well in all directions, pivoting and crossing the feet when necessary in the reverse turn. It need hardly be said that the feet should never leave the floor in the true Waltz. Gungl, Waldteufel, and the Strauss family may be said to have moulded the modern Waltz to its present form by their rhythmical and agreeable compositions. There are variations—chiefly American—which include hopping and lurching steps; these are degradations, and foreign to the spirit of the true Waltz. The Quadrille is a Contredanse of some antiquity. The Contredanse was first brought to England from Normandy by William the Conqueror, and was common all over Europe in the 16th and 17th centuries. The term Quadrille means a kind of card game, and the dance is supposed to be in some way connected with the game. A species of Quadrille appeared in a French ballet in 1745, and since that time the dance has gone by that name. Like many other dances, it came from Paris to Almack’s in 1815, and in its modern form was danced in England for the first time by Lady Jersey, Lady Harriet Butler, Lady Susan Ryder, and Miss Montgomery, with Count Aldegarde, Mr Montgomery, Mr Harley, and Mr Montague. It immediately became popular. It then consisted of very elaborate steps, which in England have been simplified until the degenerate practice has become common of walking through the dance. It can hardly be said to be popular in England to-day. This is a pity, for the Quadrille, properly danced, has many of the graces of the Minuet. It is often stated that the Contredanse, or square dance, is of modern French origin. This is incorrect, and probably arises from a mistaken identification of the terms Quadrille and square dance. “ Dull Sir John ” and “ Faine I would ” were square dances popular in England three hundred years ago. “ Country dance ” is a corrupt Anglicization of contredanse, and not, as is so often asserted, the true original name of the dance.