Page:รายงานการประชุม สผ (๒๔๗๕-๑๑-๒๕) a.pdf/27

 Nai Charun Na Bangchang said: "All that we have is already nice, it is quite clear, and this is wanted unavoidably. And anything relating to the executive matters shall only be done in one way, that is, through the People's Committee. Moreover, section 46 says he appoints [Members of] the People's Committee. If it is to say that this shall be done by and with advice and consent, it would be contrary to the principle."

Nai Charun Suepsaeng said: "The ongoing argument is about the text of section 7 only. So, I want [the House] to resolve to amend the text [by adding] '' for [the sake of] clarity."

The President of the House said: "As there is no one engaging in the discussion any further, I think that the important part of the consideration we have conducted is only in section 7. As for sections 6 and 8, they give rise to no important question and should be shelved for later consideration, because their text is already clear. So, I beg you to vote on section 7 to decide if it is acceptable or not." Most of the Members agreed with the proposal of the President of the Constitution Drafting Subcommittee that the phrase '' be removed. Accordingly, section 7 became satisfactory.

Luang Saeng proposed that the term 'House of Representatives' be amended to be 'Parliament'.

Nai Direk Chaiyanam said: "I do not agree with the amendment proposed by Luang Saeng, because the term 'Parliament' is a collective word referring to such a parliament as that of England, which consists of two chambers, that is, the House of Lords and the House of Commons, which are collectively called