Page:Über die scheinbare Masse der Ionen.djvu/3

 to involve mechanics as well. The possibility of an electromagnetic explanation of mechanics was given, after has developed a conception of the law of gravity, according to which it would be very similar to electrostatic forces. We would have to think of matter as only composed of very small positive and negative charges, which are within a certain distance from each other. By this condition, the ponderable mass is not constant but depends on the velocity, and namely we obtain terms, depending on even powers of the ratio of velocity to the velocity of light. The numerical factor by which the second term is multiplied, depends on the curvature of the trajectory, but also on the shape of the electric charge. Depending on which different way we choose the form of electrified molecules, we come to other numerical factors. Concerning the ordinary motions on earth, it vanishes because the velocity is very small. Concerning planetary motions we probably can achieve something; because we reach velocities at which we have to consider the terms of second order. On the assumption of a specific type of charge, leading to the simplest electromagnetic field, these terms become relevant in a way, so that the accelerations of two bodies by gravitation are the same up to a slightly different numerical factor, as if the bodies attract each other with constant mass according to 's laws. The electromagnetically defined mass comes into play, as if not 's, but 's law would apply.

. In essence, we agree; but already wants to go further than I do. Anyway, it seemed of interest to me to look for means, by which we can come to a decision on the issue discussed. One more thing I would like to add: I made the assumption that the sphere, which forms an ion, is rigid. But perhaps one might think that the sphere would be transformed into an ellipsoid when in motion. This has some similarity with the diversity, that was pointed out by.

. I would like to pose the question to the lecturer, concerning the reflection of cathode rays; should a rotating ion not be reflected differently, as a non-rotating one?

. Certainly, if one imagines that the reflection happens on a surface. But if you look at the reflection, which is more likely to me, as caused by forces that occur at some distance from the surface of the ion, then those surely act on the center, and then the influence of rotation vanishes.

. What does the theory say about the velocity of the ions during reflection? Does it remain the same?

. As far as I know, yes. I have not elaborated on this.

. has found that the velocity of reflection has not changed. But the experiments of on the energy of cathode rays are in contradiction to this, so I've thought that the experiments of  may not be completely correct, and maybe we could obtain a velocity change. I wanted to ask if the theory says something in this respect.

. I can not say this right now.

(Received September 30, 1900.)