Pacific Exp. Company v. Malin (131 U.S. 394)/Opinion of the Court

This case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Mr. Phillips, for defendant in error, afterwards moved for the issuance of a mandate, and stating that no notice of the motion for the mandate had been served on the opposite party, but that no opposition had been made to the dismissal of the case.

PER CURIAM.

Sufficient cause has been shown, and the mandate may issue at once. Mandate issued.