Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume V/Apologetic Works/The Great Catechism/Chapter II

Chapter II.

, then, by the higher mystical ascent by the higher mystical ascent, &#7936;&#957;&#945;&#947;&#969;&#947;&#953;&#954;&#8182;&#962;. The common reading was &#7936;&#957;&#945;&#955;&#959;&#947;&#953;&#954;&#8182;&#962;, which Hervetus and Morell have translated. But Krabinger, from all his Codd. but one, has rightly restored &#7936;&#957;&#945;&#947;&#969;&#947;&#953;&#954;&#8182;&#962;. It is not &#8220;analogy,&#8221; but rather &#8220;induction,&#8221; that is here meant; i.e. the arguing from the known to the unknown, from the facts of human nature (&#964;&#8048; &#954;&#945;&#952;&#8125; &#7969;&#956;&#8118;&#962;) to those of the Godhead, or from history to spiritual events. &#8125;&#913;&#957;&#945;&#947;&#969;&#947;&#8053; is the chief instrument in Origen&#8217;s interpretation of the Bible; it is more important than allegory. It alone gives the &#8220;heavenly&#8221; meaning, as opposed to the moral and practical though still mystical (cf. Guericke, Hist. Schol. Catech. ii. p. 60) meaning. Speaking of the Tower of Babel, he says that there is a &#8220;riddle&#8221; in the account. &#8220;A competent exposition will have a more convenient season for dealing with this, when there is a direct necessity to explain the passage in its higher mystical meaning&#8221; (c. Cels. iv. p. 173). Gregory imitates his master in constantly thus dealing with the Old Testament, i.e. making inductions about the highest spiritual truths from the &#8220;history.&#8221; So Basil would treat the prophecies (in Isai. v. p. 948). Chrysostom, on the Songs of &#8220;Degrees&#8221; in the Psalms, says that they are so called because they speak of the going up from Babylon, according to history; but, according to their high mysticism, because they lift us into the way of excellence. Here Gregory uses the facts of human nature neither in the way of mere analogy nor of allegory: he argues straight from them, as one reality, to another reality almost of the same class, as it were, as the first, man being &#8220;in the image of God&#8221;; and so &#7936;&#957;&#945;&#947;&#969;&#947;&#8053; here comes nearer induction than anything else. from matters that concern ourselves to that transcendent nature we gain a knowledge of the Word, by the same method we shall be led on to a conception of the Spirit, by observing in our own nature certain shadows and resemblances of His ineffable power. Now in us the spirit (or breath) is the drawing of the air, a matter other than ourselves, inhaled and breathed out for the necessary sustainment of the body. This, on the occasion of uttering the word, becomes an utterance which expresses in itself the meaning of the word. And in the case of the Divine nature it has been deemed a point of our religion that there is a Spirit of God, just as it has been allowed that there is a Word of God, because of the inconsistency of the Word of God being deficient as compared with our word, if, while this word of ours is contemplated in connection with spirit, that other Word were to be believed to be quite unconnected with spirit. Not indeed that it is a thought proper to entertain of Deity, that after the manner of our breath something foreign from without flows into God, and in Him becomes the Spirit; but when we think of God&#8217;s Word we do not deem the Word to be something unsubstantial, nor the result of instruction, nor an utterance of the voice, nor what after being uttered passes away, nor what is subject to any other condition such as those which are observed in our word, but to be essentially self-subsisting, with a faculty of will ever-working, all-powerful. The like doctrine have we received as to God&#8217;s Spirit; we regard it as that which goes with the Word and manifests its energy, and not as a mere effluence of the breath; for by such a conception the grandeur of the Divine power would be reduced and humiliated, that is, if the Spirit that is in it were supposed to resemble ours. But we conceive of it as an essential power, regarded as self-centred in its own proper person, yet equally incapable of being separated from God in Whom it is, or from the Word of God whom it accompanies, as from melting into nothingness; but as being, after the likeness of God&#8217;s Word, existing as a person, able to will, self-moved, efficient, ever choosing the good, and for its every purpose having its power concurrent with its will.