Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume II/Sozomen/Book IV/Chapter 26

.&#8212;''Death of Macedonius, Bishop of Constantinople. What Eudoxius said in his Teaching. Eudoxius and Acacius strenuously sought the Abolition of the Formularies of Faith set forth at Nic&#230;a and at Ariminum; Troubles which thence arose in the Churches''.

,

on his expulsion from the church of Constantinople, retired to one of the suburbs of the city, where he died. Eudoxius took possession of his church in the tenth year of the consulate of Constantius, and the third of Julian, surnamed C&#230;sar. It is related that, at the dedication of the great church called &#8220;Sophia,&#8221; when he rose to teach the people, he commenced his discourse with the following proposition: &#8220;The Father is impious, the Son is pious&#8221;; and that, as these words excited a great commotion among the people, he added, &#8220;Be calm; the Father is impious, because he worships no one; the Son is pious, because he worships the Father.&#8221; On this explanation, he threw his audience into laughter. Eudoxius and Acacius jointly exerted themselves to the utmost in endeavoring to cause the edicts of the Nicene Council to fall into oblivion. They sent the formulary read at Ariminum with various explanatory additions of their own, to every province of the empire, and procured from the emperor an edict for the banishment of all who should refuse to subscribe to it. But this undertaking, which appeared to them so easy of execution, was the beginning of the greatest calamities, for it excited commotions throughout the empire, and entailed upon the Church in every region a persecution more grievous than those which it had suffered under the pagan emperors.

For if this persecution did not occasion such tortures to the body as the preceding ones, it appeared more grievous to all who reflected aright, on account of its disgraceful nature; for both the persecutors and the persecuted belonged to the Church; and the one was all the more disgraceful in that men of the same religion treated their fellows with a degree of cruelty which the ecclesiastical laws prohibit to be manifested towards enemies and strangers.