Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume I/Church History of Eusebius/Book V/Chapter 19

Serapion on the Heresy of the Phrygians.

1., Both versions of the Chron. agree in putting the accession of Serapion into the eleventh year of Commodus (190 ), and that of his successor Asclepiades into the first year of Caracalla, which would give Serapion an episcopate of twenty-one years (Syncellus says twenty-five years, although giving the same dates of accession for both bishops that the other versions give). Serapion was a well-known person, and it is not too much to think that the dates given by the Chron. in connection with him may be more reliable than most of its dates. The truth is, that from the present chapter we learn that he was already bishop before the end of Commodus&#8217; reign, i.e. before the end of 192 Were the statement of Eutychius,&#8212;that Demetrius of Alexandria wrote at the same time to Maximus of Antioch and Victor of Rome,&#8212;to be relied upon, we could fix his accession between 189 and 192 (see Harnack&#8217;s Zeit des Ignatius, p. 45). But the truth is little weight can be attached to his report. While we cannot therefore reach certainty in the matter, there is no reason for doubting the approximate accuracy of the date given by the Chron. As to the time of his death, we can fix the date of Asclepiades&#8217; accession approximately in the year 211 (see Bk. VI. chap. II, note 6), and from the fragment of Alexander&#8217;s epistle to the Antiochenes, quoted in that chapter, it seems probable that there had been a vacancy in the see of Antioch for some time. But from the mention of Serapion&#8217;s epistles to Domninus (Bk. VI. chap. 12) we may gather that he lived until after the great persecution of Severus ( 202 sq.). From Bk. VI. chap. 12, we learn that Serapion was quite a writer; and he is commemorated also by Jerome (de vir. ill. c. 41) and by Socrates (H. E. III. 7). In addition to the epistle quoted here, he addressed to Domninus, according to Bk. VI. chap. 12, a treatise (Jerome, ad Domninum&#8230;volumen composuit), or epistle (the Greek of Eusebius reads simply &#964;&#8048;, but uses the same article to describe the epistle or epistles to Caricus and Pontius, so that the nature of the writing is uncertain), as well as some other epistles, and a work on the Gospel of Peter. These were the only writings of his which Eusebius had seen, but he reports that there were probably other works extant. There are preserved to us only the two fragments quoted by Eusebius in these two chapters. Serapion also played a prominent r&#244;le in the tradition of the Edessene church, as we learn from Zahn&#8217;s Doctrina Addai (G&#246;tt. Gel. Anz. 1877, St. 6, p. 173, 179, according to Harnack&#8217;s Zeit des Ignatius, p. 46 sqq.). who, as report says, succeeded Maximinus at that time as bishop of the church of Antioch, mentions the works of Apolinarius against the above-mentioned heresy. And he alludes to him in a private letter to Caricus and Pontius, in which he himself exposes the same heresy, and adds the following words:

2. &#8220;That you may see that the doings of this lying band of the new prophecy, so called, are an abomination to all the brotherhood throughout the world, I have sent you writings of the most blessed Claudius Apolinarius, bishop of Hierapolis in Asia.&#8221;

3. In the same letter of Serapion the signatures of several bishops are found, one of whom subscribes himself as follows:

&#8220;I, Aurelius Cyrenius, a witness, pray for your health.&#8221;

And another in this manner:

&#8220;&#198;lius Publius Julius, bishop of Debeltum, a colony of Thrace. As God liveth in the heavens, the blessed Sotas in Anchialus desired to cast the demon out of Priscilla, but the hypocrites did not permit him.&#8221;

4. And the autograph signatures of many other bishops who agreed with them are contained in the same letter.

So much for these persons.