Moore v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis/Concurrence Harlan

Mr. Justice HARLAN concurs in the result for the reasons given in his memorandum in Gibson v. Thompson, 355 U.S. 18, 19, 78 S.Ct. 2, 3, 2 L.Ed.2d 1. See also his dissenting opinion in Sinkler v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 356 U.S. 326, 332, 78 S.Ct. 758, 763, 2 L.Ed.2d 799.

For the reasons set forth in his opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U.S. 500, 524, 77 S.Ct. 443, 459, 1 L.Ed.2d 493, Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER is of the view that the writ of certiorari is improvidently granted.

Mr. Justice WHITTAKER, with whom Mr. Justice BURTON joins, dissenting.