Mechanics' and Traders' Bank Branch of the State Bank of Ohios v. Debolt/Opinion of the Court

Upon our examination of the agreed statement in this case, we find that it is ruled by the cases of The Piqua Branch of the State Bank of Ohio v. Knoop, 16 How. 369, and that of Dodge v. Woolsey, decided at this term. We therefore reverse the decree of the supreme court, and direct a mandate to issue accordingly.

Mr. Justice CATRON, Mr. Justice DANIEL, and Mr. Justice CAMPBELL, dissented.