Index talk:15 decisive battles of the world (New York).djvu

Warning: This text exists twice, same year but different publishers and different page numbers. In the London printing these are two books (chapter up to 7 and chapters 8 to 15), but in the New York printing it's only one:
 * https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index:15_decisive_battles_of_the_world_(New_York).djvu
 * https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index:15_decisive_battles_of_the_world_Vol_1_(London).djvu
 * https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index:15_decisive_battles_of_the_world_Vol_2_(London).djvu

And there is a copy without original text in https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Fifteen_Decisive_Battles_of_the_World that contains both volumes. (Note the mismatch in the spellings...) - R. J. Mathar (talk) 15:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Tone
Having now read through the first hundred-odd pages (getting the 'pointing' consistent, mostly.... uses of templates for, , , and were inconsistent, and well as mis-scanned commas) of this book, I just feel like noting that this is full of little racist "rants" about the superiority of "Europeans" over "Asiatics." Buyer beware, lol.
 * Not "explicit" racism, to be clear, he just makes it really obvious that he thinks that "Europeans" and their "culture" are superior, and the source of all real "civilization" in the world. If Xerxes had conquered Europe we would all still be barbarians, according to this guy, and he goes off-topic on the subject repeatedly.
 * "It was clearly for the good of mankind that Hannibal should be conquered; his triumph would have stopped the progress of the world;" p. 105. Jarnsax (talk) 18:45, 1 May 2023 (UTC)